This synthetic WooCommerce example demonstrates the intended diagnosis workflow.
Its timings are illustrative, not a benchmark or a claim about your site.
Illustrative dataDynamic WordPress requestNot a compatibility claim
Illustrative request trace
yoursite.com/wp-admin/tools.php?page=wp-flame
Illustrative product preview
Bundled example data only — not a live customer trace, benchmark, or promise of
identical telemetry on every host.
Capture modeStandard Manual · bounded to 1 request
CompletenessPartial Cache counters unavailable
Capture startEarly WP bootstrap Not absolute server start
Observation1 sample Directional, not verified
Observed duration1240ms
Recorded DB spans4190ms
Recorded HTTP spans2130ms
Dropped spans0in this fixture
Capture capability and completeness
Partial means the recorded spans remain useful, while unavailable telemetry stays
explicitly unknown. Standard mode is not arbitrary function-level PHP profiling.
Early lifecycle Captured
Observed from the earliest WP Flame bootstrap represented by this fixture.
Database Captured
Supported spans after database capture registration; earlier queries are not implied.
WordPress HTTP API Captured
Supported WordPress HTTP API activity only.
Hook callbacks Not requested
Standard mode does not provide callback-level detail. Use a one-shot Deep capture.
Cache counters Unavailable
Unknown in this fixture; unavailable never means zero.
Observed request timeline
Select any measured span to inspect its evidence and a cautious next action.
LifecyclePluginThemeDatabaseHTTP API
On smaller screens, use the span selector above or swipe the timeline horizontally.
0ms
310ms
620ms
930ms
1240ms
Evidence before diagnosis
Top measured opportunities
1 illustrative observation · directional
01
WooCommerce
Related-products query
65ms measured in this supported span,
based on one bundled observation. Treat it as a place to investigate, not
a confirmed root cause.
Likely next action
Inspect the normalized fingerprint and caller, test one staging change, then compare compatible product-route cohorts.
Illustrative compatible-cohort example
Before / after verification
Not a customer result or benchmark
A credible result compares the same normalized route, request type, capture mode,
capability set and score version — not one before request against one after request.
Baseline p501240ms 25 compatible observations
After p50982ms 25 compatible observations
21% lower illustrative p50
Example signal only. A real result must disclose distribution, environment
changes, capability coverage and uncertainty.
How to read it
A graph is useful only when its boundaries are visible.
01
Start with capture capability
Check the route, capture mode, completeness, and unavailable telemetry before interpreting a number.
02
Open the largest supported span
Use the timeline to inspect measured duration, WordPress ownership, and the evidence supporting a likely next action.
03
Repeat a compatible workflow
A single trace suggests where to investigate. Compatible baseline and after samples help show whether a change improved it.
Measurement boundary
What this kind of trace can and cannot say.
It can show
Observed time from WP Flame's earliest available bootstrap point
Supported lifecycle, HTTP API, compatible database, and focused callback spans
The best supported WordPress owner for captured work
It cannot guarantee
The absolute web-server request start or browser load experience
Requests served without executing PHP
Every arbitrary PHP function, query, host, or definitive root cause
Have an eligible incident?
Bring the real workflow to the design-partner programme.