Interactive sample trace

Explore the evidence before installing anything.

This synthetic WooCommerce example demonstrates the intended diagnosis workflow. Its timings are illustrative, not a benchmark or a claim about your site.

Illustrative data Dynamic WordPress request Not a compatibility claim

Illustrative request trace

Illustrative product preview Bundled example data only — not a live customer trace, benchmark, or promise of identical telemetry on every host.

Bounded request capture

Supported measured spans

WooCommerce product GET /shop/winter-jacket/ HTTP 200
Capture mode Standard Manual · bounded to 1 request
Completeness Partial Cache counters unavailable
Capture start Early WP bootstrap Not absolute server start
Observation 1 sample Directional, not verified
Observed duration 1240ms
Recorded DB spans 4190ms
Recorded HTTP spans 2130ms
Dropped spans 0in this fixture
Capture capability and completeness

Partial means the recorded spans remain useful, while unavailable telemetry stays explicitly unknown. Standard mode is not arbitrary function-level PHP profiling.

Early lifecycle Captured

Observed from the earliest WP Flame bootstrap represented by this fixture.

Database Captured

Supported spans after database capture registration; earlier queries are not implied.

WordPress HTTP API Captured

Supported WordPress HTTP API activity only.

Hook callbacks Not requested

Standard mode does not provide callback-level detail. Use a one-shot Deep capture.

Cache counters Unavailable

Unknown in this fixture; unavailable never means zero.

Observed request timeline

Select any measured span to inspect its evidence and a cautious next action.

Lifecycle Plugin Theme Database HTTP API

On smaller screens, use the span selector above or swipe the timeline horizontally.

Evidence before diagnosis

Top measured opportunities

1 illustrative observation · directional
01
WooCommerce

Related-products query

65ms measured in this supported span, based on one bundled observation. Treat it as a place to investigate, not a confirmed root cause.

Likely next action

Inspect the normalized fingerprint and caller, test one staging change, then compare compatible product-route cohorts.

Illustrative compatible-cohort example

Before / after verification

Not a customer result or benchmark

A credible result compares the same normalized route, request type, capture mode, capability set and score version — not one before request against one after request.

Baseline p50 1240ms 25 compatible observations
After p50 982ms 25 compatible observations
21% lower illustrative p50 Example signal only. A real result must disclose distribution, environment changes, capability coverage and uncertainty.
How to read it

A graph is useful only when its boundaries are visible.

01

Start with capture capability

Check the route, capture mode, completeness, and unavailable telemetry before interpreting a number.

02

Open the largest supported span

Use the timeline to inspect measured duration, WordPress ownership, and the evidence supporting a likely next action.

03

Repeat a compatible workflow

A single trace suggests where to investigate. Compatible baseline and after samples help show whether a change improved it.

Measurement boundary

What this kind of trace can and cannot say.

It can show

  • Observed time from WP Flame's earliest available bootstrap point
  • Supported lifecycle, HTTP API, compatible database, and focused callback spans
  • The best supported WordPress owner for captured work

It cannot guarantee

  • The absolute web-server request start or browser load experience
  • Requests served without executing PHP
  • Every arbitrary PHP function, query, host, or definitive root cause
Have an eligible incident?

Bring the real workflow to the design-partner programme.

Apply with a slow workflow